🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 562+ reviews
Sports ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Under Armour softball pants

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5 (562 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$14
$23.33
Sale
✓ gratis distribution on this item • Limited time offer

Brand: under ArmourSize: women’s XSColor: blackCondition: like newly-released (no signs of wear, hardly worn)Smoke at no charge, logo embroidery all intact

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

📋 Product Description

Under Armour softball pants

Brand: under Armour
Size: women’s XS
Color: black
Condition: appreciate fresh (no signs of wear, hardly worn)
Smoke gratis, logo embroidery whole intact

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Sports products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 596680

Category: Sports > Apparel > Women

Original Price: $23.33 USD

Sale Price: $14 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 3503 reviews
JD
John Davidson ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Orlando, FL
★★★★☆
appreciate it!
In daily use, the Under Armour softball pants works fine and it meets expectations.
24 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Las Vegas, NV
★★★★★
premier decision
Nice quality product Under Armour softball pants.
41 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Omaha, NE
★★★★★
Highly suggest!
The Under Armour softball pants arrived well protected.
38 people found this helpful

MW
Michelle Walker ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Portland, OR
★★★★☆
premium
Satisfied with this Under Armour softball pants.
8 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White ✓ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago · San Jose, CA
★★★★★
Absolutely treasure it
Been using the Under Armour softball pants for a few days, works as expected.
16 people found this helpful