🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 573+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Ferragamo Keyring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (573 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$36.38
$60.63
Sale
βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

The item itself has minor scratches and dullness from storage, but nothing major, so I've listed it as no noticeable scratches or stains.There is a stain on the inside of the box (see photo 7).-F

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift distribution

↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Ferragamo Keyring

The item itself has minor scratches and dullness from storage, but nothing major, so I've listed it as "no noticeable scratches or stains."
There is a stain on the inside of the box (see photo 7).






-F

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2174110

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Keychains

Original Price: $60.63 USD

Sale Price: $36.38 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 573 reviews
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly What I Needed
In daily use, the Ferragamo Keyring works fine and I’m satisfied. Arrived on time.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
magnificent Ferragamo Keyring!
Good build and cushy use Ferragamo Keyring.
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional Ferragamo Keyring!
appreciate the design and quality of this Ferragamo Keyring.
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified
3 weeks ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid Value for Money
From my experience, the Ferragamo Keyring is practical so I’m okay with it.
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified
1 week ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent Ferragamo Keyring!
The Ferragamo Keyring was slightly smaller than I expected, but still usable.